Analysis of data
Which data
you chose and why?
I chose to look
into a video clip based on ‘a conversation with an almost 2 year old’. I
transcribed this conversation, so I can later look into child language
acquisition. I chose to look at child language acquisition as this subject
links with other courses that I study in college. The way in which children
develop language is an interest of mine as I hope to work with children in the
future. I also have access to young children, who are either family or friends
which would support my investigation.
What you
found and what theory you linked it to?
From looking
at this data, I can see that the adult uses a lot of child directed speech in
order to obtain the answer they are looking for. There are many examples of
this in the transcript. Firstly, this is seen when the adult in included uses a
higher pitch and exaggerated intonation: ‘A: No^ (.) you don’t want that to be your name^ (3) you’re being silly
[giggles]’. The change in pitch on the word ‘no’ is suitable for the context as
the word no is often a face threatening act. To ensure that she does not put
the child off, she changes her pitch to sound soft. The adult also questions
the child on if she can say her name but words the interrogative in an unusual
way that the child may not understand. She asked the child ‘can you say your
name’ which the child responded to in an indirect way, as she is probably used
to the question ‘what is your name’. Theories that this links to are Jean Piaget’s (1896-1980) cognitive
development theory which states that children cannot learn unless they are
interacting with others and their environment and by making mistakes they learn
from them. Another theory this links to is Jerome Bruner (1964). Bruner believes that the child has to learn
for itself by making sense of their own environment.
What other data you could choose to go with it or replace it with to make
an investigation?
Rather than using a YouTube clip to transcribe and analyse to research
child language acquisition, I could collect my own data. I could do this by
recording my own conversations, with perhaps a family member and my three year
old nephew. I would have to record a series of interactions, in order to notice
patterns or how my own data fits into theories related to child language acquisition.
What you
would call that investigation?
The way in
which a series of conversations between 4 year old and surrounding adults vary,
compare and link to suggested theories.
No comments:
Post a Comment